Itxa/1202/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 8 ,Mumbai v. M/S Asia Pacific Marbles P.ltd
High Court
22 Feb 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1202/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 8 ,Mumbai v. M/S Asia Pacific Marbles P.ltd
Date of order
22 Feb 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/1202/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 8 ,Mumbai v. M/S Asia Pacific Marbles P.ltd, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1202 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Asia Pacific Marbles P.vt. Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant.Mr. Anil Mishra i./b. PKP Legal Solution for respondent.
CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2010
P.C. :-
1.The appeal was admitted on 30th July, 2008 on the following question of law, against the order of the ITAT dated 14th May, 2007 :-
" Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in law in directing the Assessing Officer to allow deduction under section 80IB on production of marble slabs, which was disallowed by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by CIT(A) on the ground that production of marble slabs are not a manufacturing activity ? "
2.The principle laid down in the judgment of the Supreme Court in
Income Tax /Officer V/s. Arihant Tiles & Marbles P. Ltd.[1]will be applicable
to the facts of the present case. The decision of the Supreme Court will cover the issue against the Revenue. The appeal is accordingly disposed of. The substantial question of law is accordingly answered in terms of the decision of the Supreme Court. There shall be no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.