In Itxa/1211/2017 Of Procter And Gamble Hygiene And Healthcare Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax - 8(2), the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: The finding andconclusion in that appeal will determine whether this present appeal has tobe pursued.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1211 OF 2017
Procter & Gamble Hygiene & Healthcare Ltd.
….Appellant
V/s.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax-8(2)
…Respondent----
Mr. Madhur Agrawal a/w Mr. Fenil Bhatt i/b Rajesh Shah & Co, forAppellantMr. Tejveer Singh for Respondent
---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &R. I. CHAGLA JJ DATED : 28[th] SEPTEMBER 2021
P.C. :
1Mr. Agrawal states that there is an Appeal No.4866/MUM/2015
pending before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The finding andconclusion in that appeal will determine whether this present appeal has tobe pursued. Mr. Agrawal seeks leave to withdraw this appeal with liberty tofile fresh appeal, if any order prejudicial to appellant’s interest is passed inIncome Tax Appeal No.4866/Mum/2015.
2Appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(R. I. CHAGLA J)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue