Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/12/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Itxa/12/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S. Enam Securities Pvt. Ltd

High Court 09 Oct 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/12/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S. Enam Securities Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
09 Oct 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/12/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S. Enam Securities Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

itxa12-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.12 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Mumbai ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Enam Securities Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta, senior Advocate for the appellant.Mr. Sanjiv M.Shah for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.DATED : 9TH OCTOBER, 2012 P.C. :- Counsel for the parties state that the questions raised in this appeal are covered against the revenue by the decision of this Court in the case of CIT-4 V/s. M/s. The Stock and Bond Trading Company [Income Tax appeal No.4117 of 2010] decided on 14[th ]October, 2011 and in the assessee's own case being Income Income Tax Appeal No.5372 of 2010 decided on 27[th] April, 2012. In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan