Itxa/1222/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-8,Mum v. M/S Chunilal And Co.(Tm) P.ltd
High Court
21 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1222/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-8,Mum v. M/S Chunilal And Co.(Tm) P.ltd
Date of order
21 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1222/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-8,Mum v. M/S Chunilal And Co.(Tm) P.ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1222 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-tax-8 )
Mumbai )..Appellant
V/s.
M/s.Chunilal & Co.(TM) P.Ltd., )..Respondents
----
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant
Mr.A.K.Jasani for the respondents.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 21.01.2009.
PC
1. Revenue has come in appeal on the following
question :-
(A) Whether on the facts and the circumstances of
the case and in law the Hon’ble Tribunal was
justified in holding that cessation of business has
not taken place even though the assessee has not
carried out any business activity during the year?
2. Learned Tribunal considering the evidence on
record arrived at the conclusion that there was no
cessation of business considering the profit & Loss
account of the previous year and also subsequent
years. In our opinion, it is purely a finding of
fact. In the light of that, the question as framed
would not arise. Consequently, appeal dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.