Itxa/1224/2016 Of Pankaj Investments v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax - 16(3)
High Court
28 Jan 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1224/2016 Of Pankaj Investments v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax - 16(3)
Date of order
28 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1224/2016 Of Pankaj Investments v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax - 16(3), the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Rane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1224 OF 2016
Pankaj Investments, Mumbai V/s.Additional Commissioner of IncomeTax—16(3), Mumbai
…..Appellant
….Respondent
****
Mr. Sameer Dalal, Advocate for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI, &
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI, &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.Monday, 28[th] January, 2019.
P.C. :
1.Learned Counsel Mr. Sumeet Dalal, appearing forthe appellant states that, despite best efforts, he has noinstructions from the appellant. The Income Tax Appeal isdismissed for want of instructions.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(AKIL KURESHI, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue