Itxa/1237/2019 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai 32 v. Pratiksha Shah
High Court
14 Sep 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1237/2019 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai 32 v. Pratiksha Shah
Date of order
14 Sep 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1237/2019 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai 32 v. Pratiksha Shah, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn.3.Refund of court fees, if any, as per Rules. [VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J.] [DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.]
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1237 OF 2019
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,Mumbai.. AppellantDigitallysigned bySHRADDHA Vs.SHRADDHAKAMLESHKAMLESHTALEKARPratiksha ShahTALEKARDate:2022.09.1616:59:16PAN : AAFPM4838D.... Respondent+0530****
Mr.Arvind Pinto, Advocate for appellant.
CORAM : DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND VALMIKI SA MENEZES, JJ.
DATE : 14[th] SEPTEMBER 2022
PC :
1.Learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, seeksleave to withdraw the appeal.
2.Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn.3.Refund of court fees, if any, as per Rules.
[VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J.] [DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue