Itxa/1253/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax 3, Mumbai v. M/S Jindal Drugs Ltd
High Court
16 Sep 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1253/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax 3, Mumbai v. M/S Jindal Drugs Ltd
Date of order
16 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/1253/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax 3, Mumbai v. M/S Jindal Drugs Ltd, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: In the above view, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.Refund of Court fees as per rules.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1253 OF 2017
The Pr. Commissioner OF Income Tax
.. Appellant
v/s.
M/s. Jindal Drugs Ltd.
.. Respondent
Mr. Sham Walve for the appellant None for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA &
NITIN JAMDAR, J.J.
DATED : 16[th] SEPTEMBER, 2019
P.C.
1.Mr. Walve, learned Counsel appearing in support of the appeal,
on instructions, seeks to withdraw this appeal. This for the reasonthat the tax effect involved in this appeal is less than the thresholdlimit prescribed in CBDT Circular No.3/2018 dated 11[th] July, 2018and revised Circular No.17/2019, dated 8[th] August, 2019.
2. In the above view, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.Refund of Court fees as per rules.
(NITIN JAMDAR, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue