Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1265/2011 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1265/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -V Pune v. Shri Tanaji Raghunath Waghere

High Court 11 Jan 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1265/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -V Pune v. Shri Tanaji Raghunath Waghere
Date of order
11 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1265/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -V Pune v. Shri Tanaji Raghunath Waghere, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 2In the circumstances, these Appeals are also dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1265 OF 2011WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1266 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax-V, Pune ..Appellant.V/s.Shri Tanaji Raghunath Waghere..Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Padma Divakar, for the Appellant in both the matters.None for the Respondent in both the matters. P.C:- CORAM: J.P.DEVADHAR & M.S.SANKLECHA,JJ.DATE : 11[th] JANUARY, 2013. For the reasons stated in the order passed today in Income Tax Appeal No.1267 of 2011 in The Commissioner of Income Tax-V v/s. Shri Subhash Raghunath Waghere, the present Appeals also do not raise any substantial question of law. 2In the circumstances, these Appeals are also dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan