Itxa/1267/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -8, Mumbai v. M/S Introll India Ltd., Mumbai
High Court
06 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1267/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -8, Mumbai v. M/S Introll India Ltd., Mumbai
Date of order
06 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1267/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -8, Mumbai v. M/S Introll India Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Learned counsel is also unable to state as to whether any Notice of Motion is taken out.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed being barred by limitation, with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2840 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Introll India Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 6TH JULY, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. There is a delay of almost years in filing the appeal. No Notice of Motion is taken out seeking condonation of delay through there is also no prayer clause seeking condonation in filing the appeal.. Learned counsel is also unable to state as to whether any Notice of Motion is taken out. Under this circumstances, appeal is liable to be dismissed being barred by limitation.
2.Apart from the above, the issue sought to be raised in this appeal is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case Alfa Laval(I) Ltd.V/s. DCIT reported in 266 ITR 418. The same judgment has been relied upon by the Tribunal. Learned counsel for the revenue is also not in a
position to distinguish the said judgment. In the above view of the matter, prima facie there is no merit in the appeal, apart from the fact that the appeal is delayed. In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed being barred by limitation, with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.