Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/128/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/128/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 Mumbai v. M/S. Hinditron Services P. Limited

High Court 08 Aug 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/128/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 Mumbai v. M/S. Hinditron Services P. Limited
Date of order
08 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
1989-90
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Itxa/128/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-5 Mumbai v. M/S. Hinditron Services P. Limited, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In these circumstances, we see no merit in these appeals and accordingly, all the appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.128 OF 2008WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.341 OF 2006WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1098 OF 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.128 OF 2008 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.341 OF 2006 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1098 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Hinditron Services Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.R.Ashokan for applicant. Mr.A.Vissanjifor respondent. CORAM : D.K.DESHMUKH & CORAM : D.K.DESHMUKH &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 8TH AUGUST, 2008 J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 8TH AUGUST, 2008 P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. The revenue is aggrieved by the orders of the Tribunal wherein it is held that the provision for estimated costs of rendering the warranty services debited to the profit and loss account was not a contingent liability and that the said expenditure was allowable expenditure. 2. Admittedly, the expenditure in question has been consistently allowed in the case of the assessee since the assessment year 1989-90. The Tribunal has recorded a finding that there is a full - = : 2 : = - scale service departmment run by the assessee and there is a particular method by which the expenses are estimated by the assessee. The authorities below have also relied upon a decision of the Apex Court in the case of Calcutta Co. Ltd. 37 I.T.R. 1 wherein it is held that where the assessee is following the mercantile system of accounting, estimate of accrued liability to be discharged at a future date is an allowable expenditure. Moreover, the appeal filed by the revenue against the decision of the Tribunal for the assessment year 1989-90 has already been dismissed for default and no efforts have been made to restore the said appeal. 3. In these circumstances, we see no merit in these appeals and accordingly, all the appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan