In Itxa/1285/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Xvi,Mum v. M/S P. Dinkeshkumar And Co, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1285 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax.
... Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.P.Dineshkumar & Company.... Respondent.
Ms.Anuradha Mane for the appellant.
Dr.K.Shivram with A.R.Singh & P.S.Savla for the respondent.
P.C. :
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.Having seen the findings of fact recorded by the tribunal in para-6 of the order and conclusion arrived at in para-7 thereof, we do not see any substantial question of law involved in this appeal. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue