Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1292/2011 Of Plastiblends India Ltd...

Itxa/1292/2011 Of Plastiblends India Ltd v. Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax Range 8(2)

High Court 11 Jan 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1292/2011 Of Plastiblends India Ltd v. Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax Range 8(2)
Date of order
11 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1292/2011 Of Plastiblends India Ltd v. Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax Range 8(2), the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 3In view of the above, Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1292 OF 2011 Plastiblends India Ltd...Appellant. V/s.Addl. Commissioner of Income-Tax,Range-8(2), Mumbai & Another..Respondents. Mr. Nitesh i/b. Mr. A. K. Jasani, for the Appellant.Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Respondents. P.C:- CORAM: J.P.DEVADHAR & M.S.SANKLECHA,JJ.DATE : 11[th] JANUARY, 2013. Counsel for the Appellant and Respondents states that the issues raised in the present Appeal is covered by the Judgment of this Court in the matter of Plastibends (I) Ltd. v/s. Additional CIT, reported in 318 ITR page 352, in favour of the revenue. 2Counsel for the Appellant states that the Appeal against decision of this Court in the case of Plastibends (supra) is pending before the Supreme Court. However, the pendency before the Supreme Court is not a ground for not following the order of this Court. 3In view of the above, Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan