Itxa/1301/2015 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax Central - 2 v. Shri. Ashwin S Mehta
High Court
11 Apr 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1301/2015 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax Central - 2 v. Shri. Ashwin S Mehta
Date of order
11 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
1992-93
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1301/2015 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax Central - 2 v. Shri. Ashwin S Mehta, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the light of the above, the Appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Rane* 1/3 * ITXA-1301-2015 (SR.11)Wednesday, 11.4.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYRDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1301 OF 2015
Pr. Commissioner of Income
Tax, Central-2V/s.
Shri. Ashwin S. Mehta
….Appellant
….Respondent
* * * * *
Mr. Ashok Kotangle i/by. Ms. Padma Divakar, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Pankaj Toprani, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.DATE :-11TH APRIL, 2018.
P.C. :-
1. This Appeal under Section 260A of the Income
Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenges the order dated 10[th ]
November, 2014 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal) for Assessment Year 1992-93.
2. The Revenue urges the following question of law for our consideration :-
Rane
* 2/3 * ITXA-1301-2015 (SR.11)Wednesday, 11.4.2018
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law was the Tribunal justified in restoring the matter to the Assessing Officer for de-novo assessment without giving any finding on whether the principles of natural justice have been violated ?”
3. Mr. Toprani, the Learned Counsel for the
respondent submits that after the order passed by the Tribunal, remitting the matter to the Assessing Officer, the Assessing Officer has done a re-assessment and against the said decision, the appeal was also filed by the
assessee before the Commissioner (Appeals). The
Commissioner (Appeals) has decided the said Appeal and the further subsequent appeal is filed before the Tribunal.
4.
Considering the fact that the impugned order
had already taken the effect and the fresh assessment order is passed by the Assessing Officer and the appeal is also filed and decided and further subsequent appeal before the Tribunal is pending, we are not inclined to consider the present matter.
Rane
* 3/3 * ITXA-1301-2015 (SR.11)Wednesday, 11.4.2018
5. In the light of the above, the Appeal is
dismissed. No order as to costs.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.