Itxa/130/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbai v. Mehta Steel Corporation
High Court
22 Sep 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/130/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbai v. Mehta Steel Corporation
Date of order
22 Sep 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/130/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbai v. Mehta Steel Corporation, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.130 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income-tax,Mumbai City-13, Mumbai... Appellantv/s.M/s. Mehta Steel Corporation.. Respondent
Mr.R.Asokan i/by Mr.K.B.Rao for appellant.
CORAM: R.M.LODHA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED:22ndSeptember, 2004
P.C.
Heard.2. The question raised in the appeal standsconcluded by the Division Bench judgment of thiscourt in the case of Cadell Weaving Mill Co.P.Ltd.v. Commissioner of Income Tax and anr., 249 ITR265.3. The learned counsel for the revenue, however,submits that the said judgment is under challengebefore the Supreme Court.4. Even if that be so, in so far as we areconcerned, the controversy stands concluded by the
Division Bench judgment of this court.
5. No substantial question of law arises.
Dismissed in limine.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue