In Itxa/1304/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. M/S. Vijay Corporation, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, appeal is dismissed as not maintainable with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 2974 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-tax-,
... Appellant.
V/s.
Vijay Corporation.... Respondent.
N.A.Kazi for the appellant.
Arti Sathe for the respondent.
P.C. :
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and leaned counsel for the respondent. Office objections are overruled. Registry to register the appeal.
This appeal is directed against the order dismissing miscellaneous application. This Court has already held that appeal against the order rejecting miscellaneous application is not maintainable. In this view of the matter, appeal is dismissed as not maintainable with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue