In Itxa/1310/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -10, Mumbai v. M/S Veeyes Offshore P Ltd. , Mumbai, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG) NO. 3248 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-tax-,
... Appellant.
M/s.Veeyes Offshore P.Ltd.... Respondent.
Ms.Asifa Khan for the respondent.
P.C. :
Heard. Office objections are overruled. Registry to register the appeal. Appeal is taken up for hearing by consent of parties.
2.Heard learned counsel for the parties. The Tribunal has recorded finding of fact based on appreciation of evidence and deleted penalty under section 271D of the Income Tax Act. Under these circumstances, considering the finding of fact recorded by the Tribunal, we see no substantial question of law involved in this appeal. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue