Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1326/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1326/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii Pune v. Cooper Foundry Pvt. Ltd

High Court 14 Jun 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1326/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii Pune v. Cooper Foundry Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
14 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1326/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii Pune v. Cooper Foundry Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: DATED : 14TH JUNE, 2011 P.C. :- 1.Whether the expenditure incurred on the cement foundation or reinforced cement concrete foundation is to be included in the cost of the windmill while granting depreciation at 80% on the windmill, is the question raised in this appeal.

Decision: In our opinion, the finding recorded by the Tribunal that RCC foundation forms integral part of the windmill is a finding of fact and no question of law arises from the same, Hence the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1326 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax III, Pune ..Appellant. V/s. Cooper Foundary Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta for the appellant. Ms. Aarti Sathe for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA JJ. DATED : 14TH JUNE, 2011 P.C. :- 1.Whether the expenditure incurred on the cement foundation or reinforced cement concrete foundation is to be included in the cost of the windmill while granting depreciation at 80% on the windmill, is the question raised in this appeal. 2.The Tribunal has recorded finding of fact that windmill was erected in the desert area of Rajasthan which required special foundation of reinforced cement concrete and that the said reinforced cement concrete formed integral part of the windmill. The Tribunal has also followed the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Herdilla Chemicals Ltd. reported in [1995] 216 I.T.R. 742 (Bom) in allowing the claim of the assessee. In our opinion, the finding recorded by the Tribunal that RCC foundation forms integral part of the windmill is a finding of fact and no question of law arises from the same, Hence the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan