Itxa/1330/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12, Mumbai v. M/S Satyam Enterprises, Mumbai
High Court
24 Jun 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1330/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12, Mumbai v. M/S Satyam Enterprises, Mumbai
Date of order
24 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa/1330/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12, Mumbai v. M/S Satyam Enterprises, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3.Failure on the part of the appellant to remove office objections and / or to serve unserved respondent, appeal shall stand dismissed against the unserved respondent without reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1628 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.BenchMark Asset Management ..Respondent.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan i/b. Suresh Kumar for appellant.None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 24TH JUNE, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.Appellant is directed to remove office objections, if any, and serve unserved respondent within four weeks from today.
2.Hamdust allowed. In addition to hamdast
service, private service by R.P.A.D.A / Speed post is permitted.
3.Failure on the part of the appellant to remove
office objections and / or to serve unserved respondent, appeal shall stand dismissed against the unserved respondent without reference to the Court.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue