Itxa/133/2008 Of The Commissisoner Of Income-Tax-9,Mum v. Shrdi Navinchandra N. Majithia
High Court
24 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/133/2008 Of The Commissisoner Of Income-Tax-9,Mum v. Shrdi Navinchandra N. Majithia
Date of order
24 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/133/2008 Of The Commissisoner Of Income-Tax-9,Mum v. Shrdi Navinchandra N. Majithia, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.133 OF 2008
-----------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s
appearances, Court’s orders
order or directions
-----------------------------------------------------
¦ Mr.B.M.Chaterjee for the
¦ Appellant.
¦ Ms.Priti Shukla i/b Sameer Dalal
¦ for the Respondent.
¦
¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH &
¦ J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
¦ DATED:24TH JULY, 2008
P.C.:
Heard the learned Counsel for the
appellant. Perused the order, which
is a detailed and well-reasoned
order of the tribunal. The tribunal
has relied on the view taken by the
tribunal in the case of Respondent’s
wife. Therefore, we asked the
learned Counsel appearing for the
Appellant to tell us what has been
done in relation to the decision of
the tribunal in the case of
Respondent’s wife. Last time, the
- 2 -
learned Counsel sought time to find
out the position. But even today he
is not in a position to say anything
in this regard. As the record
stands, it appears that the order
passed by the tribunal in the case
of the Respondent’s wife has gone
unchallenged, in our opinion,
therefore, it will not be
appropriate to entertain the appeal.
Appeal disposed of.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.