Case Law › High Court › Itxa/1334/2007 Of M/S Sumaraj Holdings P...

Itxa/1334/2007 Of M/S Sumaraj Holdings Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - I, Mumbai

High Court 11 Jul 2018 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

11 Jul 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1334/2007 Of M/S Sumaraj Holdings Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - I, Mumbai, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 3.In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1334 OF 2007 M/s. Sumaraj Holdings Pvt. Ltd. .. Appellant v/s. Commissioner of Income Tax-IMumbai ..Respondent None for the appellant Mr. Suresh Kumar for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J. P.C. DATED : 11[th] JULY, 2018. 1.When this appeal was called out earlier, none appeared in support of the appeal. Therefore, the appeal was kept back at the endof the board. 2.However, when this appeal was called out again, none appearedon behalf of the appellant. It appears that the appellant is notinterested in prosecuting the appeal. 3.In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) Digitally signedUdayby Uday ShivajiJagtapShivajiDate:2018.07.1317:47:28 +0530Jagtap 1 of 1

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.