In Itxa/1343/2016 Of Pankaj Investments v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax - 16(3), the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.The appeal is dismissed for want of instructions.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1343 OF 2016
Pankaj Investments .. Appellant v/s. Additioinal Commissioner of Income Tax-16(3) .. Respondent
Mr. Sameer Dalal for the appellant None for the respondent
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
M.S. SANKLECHA, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 30[th] JANUARY, 2019
1.Counsel for the appellant assessee stated that despite best efforts,
he was unable to get instructions from the appellant.
2.The appeal is dismissed for want of instructions.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue