In Itxa/1347/2016 Of Prashant Arun Sangai v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-I,(Central)-Nashik, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1347 OF 2016
Shri. Prashant Arun Sangai v/s. The Commissioner of Income Tax-I(Central) Nashik
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
Mr. Ashok Gade for the appellant
Mr. Sham Walve for the respondent
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & M.S. SANKLECHA, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 30[th] JANUARY, 2019
1.This appeal is filed by the assessee to challenge the order passedby the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ("the Tribunal" for short) refusingto rectify the judgment earlier passed in appeal before it. Counsel forthe appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal for filing writpetition challenging the order of the Tribunal, which is impugned in thisappeal or to file an independent appeal against the original judgment ofthe Tribunal, as may be advised. Permission as prayed for is granted.
2.The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.