In Itxa/1353/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-14,Mum v. M/S S.k. Exports, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: Both the appeals are, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1014 OF 2008AND INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1015 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. S.K. Exports..Respondent.
None for respondent.
Heard learned counsel for the revenue. He fairly states that the issue sought to be raised in the above appeals is fairly covered by the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of CIT V/s. Woodward GovernorIndia P. Ltd. reported in (2009) 312 I.T.R. 254 (S.C.). In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in these appeals. Both the appeals are, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue