Itxa/136/2004 Of The Director Of Income Tax,(Exemption) v. Vijayalaxmi Charitable Tr
High Court
20 Dec 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/136/2004 Of The Director Of Income Tax,(Exemption) v. Vijayalaxmi Charitable Tr
Date of order
20 Dec 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/136/2004 Of The Director Of Income Tax,(Exemption) v. Vijayalaxmi Charitable Tr, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limine.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.136 OF 2004
The Director of Income Tax,
(Exemptions), Mumbai .. Appellant.
V/s.
Mrs.Vijayalaxmi N. Mafatlal .. Respondent.
Mr.R.V. Desai, senior counsel with Ms.S.V. Bharucha
i/b. H.D. Rathod for the appellant.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA, &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 20TH DECEMBER, 2004.
P.C. :
Heard Mr.R.V. Desai, the learned senior
counsel for the revenue.
2. The claim under Section 80-L of the Income
Tax Act allowed by the Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals) and maintained by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal is in accord with the Division Bench
judgment of this court in the case of Director of
Income Tax (Exemptions) V/s. Shardaben Bhagulbhai
Mafatlal Public Charitable Trust (247 ITR 1).
3. As regards the exemption under Section 11
having been allowed to the assessee, we find that the
2
direction given by the Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals) and confirmed by the Tribunal is concluded
by the Division Bench judgment of this court in the
case of Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) V/s.
Sheth Mafatlal Gagalbhai Foundation Trust (249 ITR
533).
4. No substantial question of law arises in
this appeal. The appeal is dismissed in limine.
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.