In Itxa/1363/2019 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-28 v. Gahlot Constructions, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.In the above view, these Appeals are disposed of aswithdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1007 OF 2019
with
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1363 OF 2019
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-28
V/s.Gahlot Constructions
… Appellant
... Respondent
Mr. Nirmal C. Mohanty or the Appellant
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & NITIN JAMDAR, JJ.
P.C.:-
DATE : 19 NOVEMBER 2019.
Learned Counsel appearing in support of these Appeals,
on instructions, seeks to withdraw these Appeals. This for the reasonthat the tax effect involved in these Appeals is less than the thresholdlimit prescribed in CBDT Circular No.3/2018 dated 11 July, 2018and revised Circular No. 17/2019 dated 8 August 2019.
2.In the above view, these Appeals are disposed of aswithdrawn.
3.Refund of Court fees as per Rules.
NITIN JAMDAR, J.
M.S. SANKLECHA, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue