In Itxa/1364/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-15, Mumbai v. Jardine Llyod Thompson India Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 4.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1364 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-15
v/s.
Jardine Llyod Thompson India Pvt. Ltd.
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for the appellant None for the respondent
P.C.
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
M.S. SANKLECHA, J.J.
DATED : 6[th] FEBRUARY, 2019
1.This appeal challenges the order passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal.
2.Learned Counsel appearing in support of the appeal invites ourattention to the Circular No.3/2018 dated 11[th] July, 2018 issued by theCentral Board of Direct Taxes which inter alia directs the Revenue notto press the pending appeals where the tax effect is less than Rs.50lakhs.
3.In view of the above Circular, learned Counsel for the Revenuehas been instructed not to press the appeal as the tax effect involved inthe present appeal is less than the threshold limits of Rs.50 lakhs.
4.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
5.Refund of Court Fees as per Rules.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.