Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1367/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itxa/1367/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Health India Tpa Services P Ltd

High Court 13 Jan 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1367/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Health India Tpa Services P Ltd
Date of order
13 Jan 2017
Assessment year(s)
2009-10, 2008-09
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1367/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Health India Tpa Services P Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 6.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1367 OF 2014 Commissioner of Income Tax-2 .. Appellant v/s. Health India TPA Services P. Ltd. .. Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant Mr. Sameer Dalal for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J. P.C. DATED : 13[th] JANUARY, 2017. 1.This Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenges the order dated 21[st] February, 2014 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). The impugned order is in respect of Assessment Year 2009-10. 2.The Revenue urges the following substantial question of law for our consideration :- (i)Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in deleting the disallowance made u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961? 3.The impugned order of the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal before it by following its order dated 22[nd] February, 2013 in the respondent assessee's own case for Assessment Year 2008-09. 4.Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue states that the Revenue had preferred an appeal against the earlier order of the Tribunal dated 22[nd] February, 2013 passed in the case of respondent assessee for Assessment Year 2008-09 being Income Tax Appeal No.1797 of 2013 before this Court. However, by an order dated 30[th] November, 2015, the Revenue's appeal was rejected as not giving rise to any substantial question of law. 5.It is an agreed position between the Counsel appearing before us that the question as proposed would not give rise to any substantial question of law for the reasons recorded in our earlier order dated 30[th ]November, 2015 in Income Tax Appeal No.1797 of 2013 in respect of Assessment Year 2008-09. 6.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. (A.K. MENON, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan