Itxa/1369/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. City Cat Overseas Chemicals Ltd
High Court
07 Dec 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1369/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. City Cat Overseas Chemicals Ltd
Date of order
07 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/1369/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. City Cat Overseas Chemicals Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 4.Accordingly, all the above appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.498 OF 2016WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1354 OF 2015
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1
v/s.
Sumitomo Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 504 OF 2016
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2
v/s. Thomson Reuters India P. Ltd.
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 505 OF 2016
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 536 OF 2016WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 556 OF 2016
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-14
v/s.
M/s. Hindustan Composites Ltd.
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 507 OF 2016
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-14
v/s.
M/s. Reliance Big Broadcasting Pvt. Ltd.
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1202 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-14
v/s. M/s. Reliance Big Entertainment Pvt. Ltd.
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1942 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-14
v/s.
M/s. Reliance Broadcast Network Ltd.
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 527 OF 2016
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-17
v/s.
M/s. Globe Marketing Services
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 537 OF 2016WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 539 OF 2016
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2
v/s.
Dhanrajgir Business Pvt. Ltd.
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 547 OF 2016
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-14
v/s.
M/s. Hindustan Diamond Co. Ltd.
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 571 OF 2016
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-14
v/s.
Anil Nandkishore Goyal
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 656 OF 2016
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1
.. Appellant
v/s.
M/s. Top Class Capital Market Ltd. .. Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 726 OF 2016
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-14.. Appellant
v/s.
Apex Realty Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1163 OF 2017
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1500 OF 2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1503 OF 2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1507 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-14
v/s.
M/s. Dow Agrosciences India Pvt. Ltd.
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1186 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-14.. Appellant
v/s. M/s. Kaycee Shares Broking Pvt. Ltd.
.. Respondent
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1322 OF 2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1518 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2
v/s. Abbot India Ltd.
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1369 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2
v/s.
City Cat Overseas Chemicals Ltd.
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1483 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2v/s. Trans Impex Pvt. Ltd.
.. Appellant.. Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1597 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2v/s. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.
.. Appellant.. Respondent
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1785 OF 2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1787 OF 2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1803 OF 2017WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1819 OF 2017
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1825 OF 2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 114 OF 2018WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 226 OF 2018WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1613 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2
v/s.
Mathakia Investment P. Ltd.
.. Appellant.. Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 353 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2
v/s. Seaprincess Hotels & Properties Pvt. Ltd.
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 359 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2.. Appellant
v/s. Trans Impex Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant in all the appeals
.. Appellant.. Respondent
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1785 OF 2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1787 OF 2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1803 OF 2017WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1819 OF 2017
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1825 OF 2017WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 114 OF 2018WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 226 OF 2018WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1613 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2
v/s.
Mathakia Investment P. Ltd.
.. Appellant.. Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 353 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2
v/s. Seaprincess Hotels & Properties Pvt. Ltd.
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 359 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2.. Appellant
v/s. Trans Impex Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant in all the appeals
Mr. Atul Jasani for the respondent in ITXA Nos. 498/16, 1354/15,504/16, 726/16, 1322/17, 1785/17, 1787/17, 1803/17, 1819/17,1825/17, 114/18, 226/18 and 1613/18.
Ms. Aasifa Khan a/w Mr. Satish Mody for the respondent in ITXA Nos.527/16 and 353/18.
Mr. Jitendra Jain a/w Mr. Sameer Dalal for the respondent in ITXA656/16
Mr. Hiten Chande I/b Mint & Confreres for the respondent in ITXA1483/17 and 359/18
Mr. Sanjeev M. Shah for the respondent in ITXA 1597/17
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & M.S. SANKLECHA, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 7[th] DECEMBER, 2018.
1.These appeals challenge the orders passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal.
2.Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing in support of theappeals invites our attention to the Circular No.3/2008 dated 11[th] July,2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes which inter aliadirects the Revenue not to press the pending appeals where the taxeffect is less than Rs.50 lakhs.
3.In view of the above Circular, Mr. Suresh Kumar has beeninstructed not to press the appeals as the tax effect involved in all thepresent appeals is less than the threshold limits of Rs.50 lakhs.
4.Accordingly, all the above appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
5.Refund of Court Fees as per Rules.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.