Itxa/138/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iv v. Solapur Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd
High Court
07 Jul 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/138/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iv v. Solapur Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd
Date of order
07 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/138/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iv v. Solapur Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.As such, the appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 138 OF 2015
The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV
.. Appellant
v/s.
Solapur Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd.
.. Respondent
Mr. Tejveer Singh for the appellant Mr. Ruturaj H. Gurjar i/b Mihir C. Naniwadekar for the respondent
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & A.M. BADAR, J.J.
DATED : 7[th] JULY, 2017
P.C.
1.Mr. Tejveer Singh, learned Counsel for the appellant and the
learned Counsel for the respondent are ad-idem that the question raised in the present appeal is decided by this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.1117 of 2013 under order dated 17[th] March, 2015. The said issue is decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
2.In view of the above and for the reasons recorded in the order
dated 17[th] March, 2015 in Income Tax Appeal No.1117 of 2013, no
substantial question of law arises.
3.As such, the appeal stands dismissed. No costs.
(A.M. BADAR, J.)
(S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.