Itxa/1388/2015 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. Amphenol Interconnect India Pvt Ltd
High Court
18 Apr 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1388/2015 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. Amphenol Interconnect India Pvt Ltd
Date of order
18 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/1388/2015 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. Amphenol Interconnect India Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 6.The appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1388 OF 2015
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-5Pune
.. Appellant
v/s.
Amphenol Interconnect India P. Ltd. .. Respondent
Ms. Swapna Gokhale i/b Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellantMr. R. Murlidhar i/b Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 18[th ]APRIL, 2018.
1.This Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenges the order dated 27[th] April, 2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). The impugned order is in respect of Assessment Year 2005-06.
2.The Revenue urges the only following question of law for our consideration :-
(i) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and
in law, the Tribunal was justified in considering TNMM as MAM, without considering the FAR analysis of the transaction as reported in TP study report?
3.It is an agreed position between the parties that the facts in the context of the question posed for our consideration are identical to the facts as existing in the Assessment Years 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09. In fact, the impugned order of the Tribunal inter alia places reliance upon its order dated 30[th] May, 2015 in respect of the Assessment Years 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09. Being aggrieved by the above order of the Tribunal dated 30[th] May, 2015, the Revenue filed appeals to this Court being Income Tax Appeal No.1139 of 2015, 1102 of 2015 and 1100 of 2015. This Court by a common order dated 7[th ]March, 2018 rejected the Revenue's appeals upholding the order of the Tribunal dated 30[th] May, 2015.
4.In the absence of the any distinguishing features being shown to us in the subject Assessment Year to that existing in Assessment Years 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09, the same must apply in the subject Assessment Year. The reasons indicated in our order dated 7[th] March, 2018 in respect of the Appeal Nos. 1131 of 2015, 1102 of 2015 and 1100 of 2015 in respect of the same respondent assessee for the earlier
1388-15-ITXA-10=.doc
assessment years, would equally apply to the facts of the present appeal.
5.Accordingly, the question as proposed does not give rise to any substantial question of law. Thus, not entertained.
6.The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.