In Itxa/1393/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S.r.t.exports Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1393 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-3,Mumbai-20
Mumbai-20..AppellantV/s.M/s. R.T. Exports Ltd., Mumbai..Respondent
Mr. Vimal Gupta for AppellantNone for Respondent
1.Both the Commisioner (Appeals) and ITAT haverecorded a finding that on the facts the order shouldnot have been rectified as it was a debatable issue andalso as different remedy was available to revenue.
2.Considering the findings recorded by the Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax and also by ITAT, thejudgmenet of the Supreme Court in Commissioner ofIncome Tax V/s. Hero Cycles Ltd., (1997) 228 ITR 3463,there is no reason to defer from the view taken.Consequently the question of law does not arises. TheAppeal disposed of accordingly.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.