Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1393/2008 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1393/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S.r.t.exports Ltd., Mumbai

High Court 07 Jan 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1393/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S.r.t.exports Ltd., Mumbai
Date of order
07 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/1393/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S.r.t.exports Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1393 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax-3,Mumbai-20 Mumbai-20..AppellantV/s.M/s. R.T. Exports Ltd., Mumbai..Respondent Mr. Vimal Gupta for AppellantNone for Respondent 1.Both the Commisioner (Appeals) and ITAT haverecorded a finding that on the facts the order shouldnot have been rectified as it was a debatable issue andalso as different remedy was available to revenue. 2.Considering the findings recorded by the Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax and also by ITAT, thejudgmenet of the Supreme Court in Commissioner ofIncome Tax V/s. Hero Cycles Ltd., (1997) 228 ITR 3463,there is no reason to defer from the view taken.Consequently the question of law does not arises. TheAppeal disposed of accordingly.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan