Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1404/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1404/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8, Mumbai v. M/S. Cybertech System And Software Limited, Mumbai

High Court 07 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1404/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8, Mumbai v. M/S. Cybertech System And Software Limited, Mumbai
Date of order
07 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1404/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-8, Mumbai v. M/S. Cybertech System And Software Limited, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with no order as to cost.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 2978 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-tax-, ... Appellant. V/s. M/s.Cybertech Systems & Software Limited.... Respondent. Suresh Kumar for the appellant. CORAM :V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 7[th] July 2009. P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the appellant. The delay in filing appeal is about 900 days. Admittedly no notice motion is taken out for condonation of delay. No material facts and particulars are to be found in support of the prayer to condone delay. As no sufficient cause is made out, we have no option but to dismiss the appeal as barred by limitation. Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with no order as to cost.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan