Itxa/1409/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 8 v. Atos Origin (India) Pvt. Ltd
High Court
11 Jan 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1409/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 8 v. Atos Origin (India) Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
11 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1409/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 8 v. Atos Origin (India) Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3In view of the above, Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1409 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant.V/s.M/s. ATOS Origin (India) Ltd...Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Appellant.Mr. R. Murlidhar with Mr. A.K. Jasani, for the Respondent.
P.C:-
CORAM: J.P.DEVADHAR & M.S.SANKLECHA,JJ.DATE : 11[th] JANUARY, 2013.
In this Appeal, the Revenue has raised the following question
of law:-
“Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble Tribunal is justified in deleting the disallowance of deduction u/s 10/10B of Rs.74,56,071/- in view of the provisions of section 10B, which does not define the Total Turnover to exclude certain expenses from the total turnover, as is defined in section 80HHC, 80HHE and 80HHF of the Income Tax Act, 1961.?”
2Counsel for the parties state that the above question of law
stands answered against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee by the decision of this Court in the matter of Commissioner of Income-Tax v/s. Gem plus Jewellery India Ltd. reported in 330 ITR 175.
3In view of the above, Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.