Itxa/14/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 Mumbai v. Sterling Newspapers Private Limited, Mumbai
High Court
25 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/14/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 Mumbai v. Sterling Newspapers Private Limited, Mumbai
Date of order
25 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
2002-03
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/14/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 Mumbai v. Sterling Newspapers Private Limited, Mumbai, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 14 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-3
.. Appellant
v/s.
M/s. Sterling Newspapers Pvt. Ltd.
.. Respondent
None for the appellant Mr. Atul Jasani for the respondent
P.C.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.J.
DATED : 25[th] JANUARY, 2016.
1.This appeal relates to Assessment Year 2002-03. None appears in support of the appeal. It appears that the Revenue is not interested in pursuing this appeal. Moreover, we notice that in para 9 of the Appeal Memo, the tax effect involved is Rs. 6.38 lakhs. Therefore, in view of the Central Board of Direct Tax Circular No.21/15 dated 10[th ]December, 2015, the Revenue it seems is not interested in pursuing this appeal.
2.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue