Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1423/2011 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1423/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 21 Mumbai v. Anish B. Kamdr

High Court 13 Jun 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1423/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 21 Mumbai v. Anish B. Kamdr
Date of order
13 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/1423/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 21 Mumbai v. Anish B. Kamdr, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Decision: Kalpataru Colours and Chemicals Ltd reported in 328 ITR 451 (Bom), we direct the Assessing Officer while reconsidering the relief, to take into consideration, the aforesaid decision of this Court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
* 1 * ITA (L). 2103.201013.6.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO. 2103 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-21,MumbaiV/S.Anish B. Kamdar ........ Petitioner ....... Respondent * * * * Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the appellant. None for the respondent. CORAM :- J.P. DEVPADHAR, & SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATED :- 13 June, 2011. P.C. :- 1. This Appeal is filed by the revenue against the order of ITAT dated 30[th ]April, 2010 whereby the Tribunal has remanded the issue to the file of the Assessing Officer to re-work the relief under Section 80HHC in the light of the Special Bench decision of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. Topman Exports V/S. ITO in ITA No. 5769/Mum/2006. Since the Tribunal has remanded the matter back to the file of the Assessing Officer, we are not inclined to entertain this Appeal. However, as the Special Bench decision of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. Topman Exports (supra) has been overruled by this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Kalpataru Colours and Chemicals Ltd reported in 328 ITR 451 (Bom), we direct the Assessing Officer while reconsidering the relief, to take into consideration, the aforesaid decision of this Court. The Appeal is accordingly disposed off. No order as to costs. [SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J] [J.P. DEVADHAR, J]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan