Itxa/1430/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -17 Mumbai v. K. Mohan And Co (Exports )
High Court
14 Jun 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1430/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -17 Mumbai v. K. Mohan And Co (Exports )
Date of order
14 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/1430/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -17 Mumbai v. K. Mohan And Co (Exports ), the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Issue: B.Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT is right in holding that the face value of DEPB is chargeable to tax u/s.28 (iiib) at the time of accrual of income ?law, the ITAT is right in holding that the face value of DEPB is chargeable to tax u/s.28 (iiib) at th...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL(LOD) NO.1985 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-17
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. K. Mohan & Co. (Exports)
..Respondent.
Mr. D.K. Kamwal for the appellant.
Mr. A.K. Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA JJ.
DATED : 14TH JUNE, 2011
P.C. :-
1.The appeal is admitted on the following questions of law:-
A.Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT is legally right in holding that the entire amount received on sale of DEPB entitlement does not represent profit chargeable u/s.28 (iiid) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ?law, the ITAT is legally right in holding that the entire amount received on sale of DEPB entitlement does not represent profit chargeable u/s.28 (iiid) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ?
B.Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT is right in holding that the face value of DEPB is chargeable to tax u/s.28 (iiib) at the time of accrual of income ?law, the ITAT is right in holding that the face value of DEPB is chargeable to tax u/s.28 (iiib) at the time of accrual of income ?
Counsel for the parties state that both the questions are
answered in favour of the revenue by the decision in the case of CIT V/s. Kalpataru Colours & Chemicals reported in [2010] 328 ITR 451 (Bom). Accordingly, the appeal is disposed off by answering the question in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. No order as to costs.
(SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.