Itxa/1434/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- Ii, Pune v. M/S. Trimurti Developers
High Court
01 Oct 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1434/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- Ii, Pune v. M/S. Trimurti Developers
Date of order
01 Oct 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/1434/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax- Ii, Pune v. M/S. Trimurti Developers, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sbw
*1*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1434 OF 2012
The Commissioner of Income Tax-IIPune.
..Appellant
-Versus-M/s. Trimurti Developers..Respondent
...........
Mr. Vimal Gupta, Senior Counsel, with Vipul Arun Bajpayee for the Appellant.
...........
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
AND A. K. MENON, JJ.
DATE :- 1[st] OCTOBER, 2014
P.C.:
1]Mr. Vimal Gupta, learned Senior Counsel, appearing on behalf of the Revenue in support of this Appeal submits that the questions of law which arise out of the Tribunal's order and which have been formulated at page 8, 9 and 10 of the paper book, are all answered by the common judgments
and which have been delivered by us on 19[th] September, 2014 in Income Tax Appeal No.201 of 2012 in the case of The Commissioner of Income Tax-16 V/s. M/s. Happy Home Enterprises and in Income Tax Appeal No.308 of 2012 in the case of The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-II, Mumbai V/s. M/s. Kanakia Spaces Pvt. Ltd.
1/2
2]The questions have been answered in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue. In view thereof, the Appeal does not raise any substantial question of law. It is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs.
(A. K. MENON, J.)
(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
wadhwa
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.