In Itxa/1436/2011 Of The Director Of Income- Tax,(Internationmal- Taxation) v. General Tire International Co, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Issue: 2.In this Case, the Tribunal has disposed of the appeal on merits by relying upon its decision in the assessee's own case for the earlier years but had not considered the question as to the whether CIT was justified in invoking the jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Decision: In this view of the matter, by consent, the order of the ITAT dated 2/8/2001 is quashed and set aside the the matter is restored to the file of the ITAT for decision afresh in accordance with law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL(LOD) NO.217 OF 2002
The Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. General Tyre International Co.
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
Mr. A.K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA JJ.
P.C. :-
DATED : 14TH JUNE, 2011
1.Matter not on board. By consent of the parties, the appeal is taken up for admission.
2.In this Case, the Tribunal has disposed of the appeal on merits by relying upon its decision in the assessee's own case for the earlier years but had not considered the question as to the whether CIT was justified in invoking the jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In this view of the matter, by consent, the order of the ITAT dated 2/8/2001 is quashed and set aside the the matter is restored to the file of the ITAT for decision afresh in accordance with law. The appeal is disposed off accordingly with no order as to costs.
(SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.