Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1439/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itxa/1439/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax 9 v. M/S.zen Shaving Ltd

High Court 31 Oct 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1439/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax 9 v. M/S.zen Shaving Ltd
Date of order
31 Oct 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1439/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax 9 v. M/S.zen Shaving Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

itxa-1439-12.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1439 OF 2012 … Commissioner of Income Tax-9 ...Appellant v/s. M/s.Zen Shaving Ltd. ...Respondent … Mr.Arvind Pinto for the Appellant.None for the Respondent. ... CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 31 OCTOBER 2014 P.C.: Having heard Mr.Pinto, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue, we do not find that the order of the Tribunal dated 27[th] March 2012 raises any substantial question of law. 2.The factual findings on the question of issue of equity shares were enough for the Tribunal to conclude that the Assessing Officer was in complete error. In these circumstances, the findings of fact in paras 4 & 5 cannot be said to be suffering from any perversity or vitiated by any error of law on the face of the record.3.The Appeal does not raise any substantial question of law. It is, accordingly, dismissed. (A.A. SAYED, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan