In Itxa/144/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii, Pune v. Loknete Balasaheb Desai, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the light ofthe above, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 144 OF 2008
The Commissioner ofIncome-tax -II, Pune.
... Appellant.
V/s.
Loknete Balasaheb Desai.
... Respondent....
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
...
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &K.U. CHANDIWAL,JJ.
DATE : 03rd JULY, 2008.
P.C. :
.Question of law as framed is in paragraph 5.The same is answered against revenue by this Court the Judgment reported in 301 ITR 191. In the light ofthe above, the appeal is dismissed.
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
(K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)
in
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue