Itxa/144/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ltu Mumbai v. The Shipping Corporation Of India Ltd
High Court
07 Jul 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/144/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ltu Mumbai v. The Shipping Corporation Of India Ltd
Date of order
07 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/144/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ltu Mumbai v. The Shipping Corporation Of India Ltd, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Decision: 5.The appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 144 OF 2015
The Commissioner of Income Tax-LTU,Mumbai
v/s.
.. Appellant
The Shipping Corporation of India Ltd.
.. Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant None for the respondent
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & A.M. BADAR, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 7[th] JULY, 2017
1.This appeal pertains to Assessment Year 2006-07.
2.Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel for the appellant submits that it does not appear that the appeal for earlier assessment year was filed.
3.The learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the tax effect involved in the present appeal is less than Rs.20 lakhs and as per the CBDT Circular No.21 of 2015 dated 10[th] December, 2015, the department has taken a policy decision not to prosecute the appeals
wherein the tax effect is less than Rs.20 lakhs.
4.In view of the above, the learned Counsel for the appellant
seeks leave to withdraw the appeal.
5.The appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
6.The Court Fees as per Rules, be refunded.
(A.M. BADAR, J.)
(S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.