Itxa/146/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Incomes Tax, Cisty-Viii v. Tat Hstg. Developmenta Co Ltd
High Court
20 Dec 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/146/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Incomes Tax, Cisty-Viii v. Tat Hstg. Developmenta Co Ltd
Date of order
20 Dec 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/146/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Incomes Tax, Cisty-Viii v. Tat Hstg. Developmenta Co Ltd, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limine.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.146 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
City VIII, Mumbai .. Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Tata Housing Development
Co. Limited .. Respondent.
Mr.R.V. Desai, senior counsel with Mr.A.S. Rao i/b.
H.D. Rathod for the appellant.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA, &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 20TH DECEMBER, 2004.
DATED : 20TH DECEMBER, 2004.
DATED : 20TH DECEMBER, 2004.
P.C. :
Heard.
2. The impugned order does not suffer from
any legal infirmity.
3. No substantial question of law arises in
this appeal. The appeal is dismissed in limine.
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue