In Itxa/146/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 14 Mumbai v. Rajkumar Sandeep Kumar Huf, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.822 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-14 MumbaiV/s.Rajkumar Sandeep Kumar HUF
..... Appellants
..... Respondent
----
Ms.Padma Divakar for the appellants.Mr.B.V.Jhaveri for the respondent.
----
CORAM : J.P.DEVADHAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE :24/1/ 2011
P.C.
1.Counsel for the Revenue states that similar questions raised by the Revenue in the assessee's own case being Income Tax Appeal (L) No.2941 of 2009 has been dismissed on 20.1.2010. For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue