In Itxa/1464/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 Mumbai v. M/S. Dhanpankaj Polyster, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.The appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1464 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Dhanpankaj Polyster
..Respondent.
Mr. A.S. Shivsharan for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 26TH AUGUST, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. The issue sought to be raised in the appeal is covered by the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Emptee Poly-Yarn P. Ltd. reported in [2008] 305 I.T.R.309 (Bom). The learned counsel for the revenue could not distinguish the said judgment. In this view of the matter, the question is answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.
2.The appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.