Itxa/1464/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 6 Mumbai v. Mandhana Industries Ltd
High Court
22 Jul 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1464/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 6 Mumbai v. Mandhana Industries Ltd
Date of order
22 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/1464/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 6 Mumbai v. Mandhana Industries Ltd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.The appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1464 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-6, Mumbai
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Mandhana Industries Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
Mr Prakash Shah i/b. PDS legal for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A.SAYED, JJ.
DATED : 22ND JULY, 2011
P.C. :-
1.In view of the fact that the ITAT has restored the main issue regarding the maintainance of separate books of accounts and allocation of common expenditure to the file of the assessing officer, the parties submit that the questions raised in the present appeal may also be restored to the file of the assessing officer for de novo consideration in the light of the decision of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Dresser Rand India Ltd reported in [2010] 323 IT 429 (Bom). Accordingly, the matter is restored to the file of the assessing officer with directions to the assessing officer to pass fresh order in accordance with law.
2.The appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
3.Contentions of both the sides are kept open.
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.