Itxa/1470/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-2,Mumbai-400 020 v. M/S. Tata Petrodyne Ltd, Mumbai-400 001
High Court
08 Apr 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1470/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-2,Mumbai-400 020 v. M/S. Tata Petrodyne Ltd, Mumbai-400 001
Date of order
08 Apr 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1470/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-2,Mumbai-400 020 v. M/S. Tata Petrodyne Ltd, Mumbai-400 001, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1470 OF 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax-2
-Versus-M/s. Tata Petrodyne Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
...........
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Mr. Mandar Vaidya a/w Srihari M. Iyer for the Respondent.
…..........
CORAM: S. C. DHARMADHIKARI AND A. K. MENON, JJ.
DATE :- 8[th] APRIL, 2015.
P.C.:
The questions herein are more or less identical and which are already the subject matter of Income Tax Appeal No.1469 and 1471/2013 which have been disposed of by us today. Even the additional question arising therein is stated to be covered by a Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. V/s. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax reported in 328 ITR 81.
2]In the light of this conclusion, even this Appeal does not raise any substantial question of law. It is, thus, dismissed. No costs.
(A. K. MENON, J.)
(S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue