Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1476/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itxa/1476/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - 15 v. M/S. Fortaleza Developers

High Court 01 Oct 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1476/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - 15 v. M/S. Fortaleza Developers
Date of order
01 Oct 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1476/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - 15 v. M/S. Fortaleza Developers, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

sbw *1* IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1476 OF 2012 Commissioner of Income Tax-15 ..Appellant -Versus-M/s. Fortaleza Developers ..Respondent ........... Mr. A. R. Malhotra with N. A. Kazi for the Appellant. Mr. J. D. Mistri, Senior Counsel, with Mr. A. K. Jasani for the Respondent............ CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI AND A. K. MENON, JJ. DATE :- 1[st] OCTOBER, 2014 P.C.: 1]The three questions of law which arise out of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, in Income Tax Appeal No.4327/Mum/2010 relating to assessment year 2007-08, are all answered by our judgment and order in the case of The Commissioner of Income Tax-16 V/s. M/s. Happy Home Enterprises and The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-II, Mumbai V/s. Kanakia Spaces Pvt. Ltd. in Income Tax Appeal Nos.201 of 2012 and 308 of 2012. Both decided on 19[th] September, 2014. 2]The questions stand answered against the Revenue not only by this 1/2 judgment and order but also in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Brahma Associates reported in (2011) 333 ITR 289. 3]In view thereof, this Appeal does not raise any substantial question of law. It is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. (A. K. MENON, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) wadhwa
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan