Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/148/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/148/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax ,Bombay-City- Vii v. Vaishali Road Carriera P.ltd

High Court 11 Aug 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/148/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax ,Bombay-City- Vii v. Vaishali Road Carriera P.ltd
Date of order
11 Aug 2004
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/148/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax ,Bombay-City- Vii v. Vaishali Road Carriera P.ltd, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limine.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.148 OF 2002 The Commissioner of Income-tax Bombay City-VII, Bombay .. Appellant. V/s. M/s.Vaishali Road Carriers .. Respondent. Mr.K.R. Chaudhary i/b. H.D.Rathod for the appellant. CORAM : R.M. LODHA, & CORAM : R.M. LODHA, &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 11TH AUGUST, 2004. DATED : 11TH AUGUST, 2004. P.C. : . Heard Mr.K.R. Chaudhary, the learned counsel for the revenue. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has dealt with the matter elaborately for reaching the conclusion that the assessement done by the assessee based on 50% of the value of goods was quiet reasonable. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concurred with the view and adopted the reasoning of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). 3. In our considered view the concurrent 2 finding of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is concluded on facts. 4. No substantial question of law arises in this appeal. 5. The appeal is dismissed in limine. (R.M. LODHA, J.) (R.M. LODHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan