Itxa/148/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Iii Mumbai v. M/S.bharat Pulverising Mills Pvt.ltd
High Court
22 Apr 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/148/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Iii Mumbai v. M/S.bharat Pulverising Mills Pvt.ltd
Date of order
22 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/148/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Iii Mumbai v. M/S.bharat Pulverising Mills Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.148 OF 2009The Commissioner of Income Tax..AppellantVs.M/s.Bharat Pulverising Mills Pvt.Ltd. ..RespondentMr.P.S.Sahadevan for Appellant.Mr.Deepak Tralshawala with Mr.Prashant Ghelanii/b. Tanvi Gandhi & Saten Vora for respondent.CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATE : 22ND APRIL,2009P.C.1.Heard the learned Counsel for parties.
2.The Revenue has filed this appeal against the
order of the Tribunal dated 5th December, 2006contending that the Tribunal was not correct inupholding the CIT(A)’s order of quashing thereassessment order as illegal and void-ab-initio,ignoring and without appreciating the evidence on
record and that the opportunity of being heard given
to the assessee.
3.Learned Counsel appearing on behalf ofrespondent strongly canvassed that it was obligatoryon the part of Revenue to supply the reasons recordedfor reopening of assessment under section 147 of theIncome Tax Act,1961. Since no reasons were given,respondent was deprived of the right to object to thereasons recorded. He, thus, submits that order of the
Tribunal, is in accordance with law and it need not be
interfered with.
4.During the course of hearing, the reasons
terms of this order by consent of parties. No order
as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.