Itxa/1489/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central-Ii v. Smt. Manju R. Gupta
High Court
24 Dec 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1489/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central-Ii v. Smt. Manju R. Gupta
Date of order
24 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1489/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central-Ii v. Smt. Manju R. Gupta, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The Appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
sbw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.34 OF 2013WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1489 OF 2012WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1692 OF 2012
Commissioner of Income Tax,Central-II
..Appellant
-Versus-Smt. Manju R. Gupta
..Respondent
...........
Mr. A. R. Malhotra a/w N. A. Kazi i/b. Ms. Padma Divakar for the Appellant.
Mr. J. D. Mistri, Senior Advocate, a/w P. C. Tripathi i/b. Atul Jasani for the Respondent.
...........
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARIAND A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE :- 24[th] DECEMBER, 2014
P.C.:
It is stated that the controversy in this Appeal is partially covered by our order passed today in Income Tax Appeal No.172/2013.
2]There is an additional question of law at page 7 of the paper book. However, this is also covered by the Division Bench judgment of this Court
in the case of Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. V/s. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax reported in 328 ITR 81. Further, the order
wadhwa
only directs the Assessing Officer to proceed in accordance with law and this judgment. In the light of this judgment, even the third question cannot be termed as substantial question of law. The Appeal is, therefore, dismissed. No costs.
(A. A. SAYED, J.)
(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.